It's easy to just nod along when someone calls an English teacher in China an "LBH." You hear the term thrown around, often with a shared wince. It generally refers to the perception that these expats, the vast majority of whom teach English, found they couldn't get the jobs they were hoping for – maybe in the tech sector, maybe in management, maybe even in the arts or media – back home, and ended up here, teaching young Chinese kids the alphabet and basic grammar. It implies a sort of career dead-end, a place where ambitious people eventually wash up, metaphorically speaking. But is this label fair? Or is it just a catchy way to describe a complex reality?
From the inside, looking out, it feels a bit unfair. For many, the choice to become an English teacher in China wasn't a failure, but a calculated move. Perhaps they needed time, space, or a different kind of experience after a tough job hunt or a career shift. Maybe they discovered a passion for teaching they never knew they had, or felt a calling to help students internationally. The path wasn't necessarily a dead-end; it was a pivot. Sometimes, "pivot" sounds a whole lot like "failure," but in the right context, it's just adaptation.
And then there's the sheer numbers game. English teachers in China – let's call them ETICs – are *everywhere*. It’s a massive industry employing tens of thousands of expats and even more Chinese nationals. In this sea of English teachers, stereotypes can easily arise and be amplified. When one expat shares their experience, it can feel like a common story, especially because... well, let's face it... a lot of them are in the same boat, relatively speaking. The perception that they're all "LBHs" can feel like a self-fulfilling prophecy among the community itself, or even as a default setting for those unfamiliar with the nuances.
But the flip side is equally important. Many ETICs are incredibly skilled, patient, and dedicated educators. They bring diverse perspectives and languages right into the heart of Chinese classrooms. They are often highly competent professionals – doctors, engineers, academics – who simply chose a different path. Their presence isn't just about the label; it's about the real impact they have on students and the local community. Yet, the "LBH" tag can overshadow these positive contributions, reducing a varied career choice to a single, somewhat pejorative label.
The reason for the perception might lie partly in the "contrast effect." It's not that being an ETIC is inherently bad, but rather that it's often seen as a stark contrast to the lives they *could* have imagined back home. The "back home" context is crucial. For some, "back home" might mean struggling for a niche in a saturated job market, facing burnout, or dealing with dissatisfaction. Here, they are teaching, often with job security, competitive salaries, and a clear structure. The comparison highlights the gap between expectation and reality, perhaps focusing too much on the "back home" aspect.
Moreover, the lifestyle shift is significant. Moving to a new country, often far from family and friends, requires a degree of adjustment that isn't part of the standard office job trajectory. While some embrace it wholeheartedly, others might feel a sense of nostalgia or longing for their previous circumstances. This emotional pull towards the "home country" way of life can fuel the perception, even if the reality on the ground is quite positive and enriching.
Interestingly, there's a layer to this perception that goes beyond the job itself. The label "LBH" sometimes carries an unspoken assumption about the *type* of person who becomes an English teacher. It implies someone who lacks ambition, isn't smart enough or skilled enough for other roles, or perhaps is overly idealistic and didn't land the big career opportunity. It paints a picture of someone who "settles," whereas the truth is often far more complex. Some ETICs are recent graduates still figuring things out, others are experienced professionals taking a sabbatical, many are simply drawn to the adventure and the chance to make a difference in language education.
Here's a surprising twist: not everyone who comes to China to teach English stays stuck in the "failure narrative." Many find that their time here, with its unique experiences and exposure to a different culture, actually *enhances* their future prospects. The teaching experience develops transferable skills like patience, communication, and cultural adaptability. And crucially, the network and perspective gained in China can open doors in other countries. Some former ETICs have found even better job opportunities abroad because of the unique skill set and international outlook they developed *while* teaching. So, the "failure" is often temporary, or perhaps, the perception is outdated.
Ultimately, labelling all English teachers in China as "LBHs" feels reductive and, dare I say, a bit unkind. It misses the complexity, the variety of reasons why people choose this path, and the genuine value they bring. For many, teaching English in China isn't a sign of defeat, but a passport to new experiences, personal growth, and even professional advantages. It's a bridge, not a wall, connecting cultures and fostering understanding. The journey might look different from the "back home," but it's a journey worth taking.
Categories:
Everywh, English,
Rate and Comment
